ABSTRAK Karina Dara Puspita
Terbatas  Alice Diniarti
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
Terbatas  Alice Diniarti
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
COVER Karina Dara Puspita
Terbatas  Alice Diniarti
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
Terbatas  Alice Diniarti
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
BAB1 Karina Dara Puspita
Terbatas  Alice Diniarti
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
Terbatas  Alice Diniarti
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
BAB2 Karina Dara Puspita
Terbatas  Alice Diniarti
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
Terbatas  Alice Diniarti
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
BAB3 Karina Dara Puspita
Terbatas  Alice Diniarti
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
Terbatas  Alice Diniarti
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
BAB4 Karina Dara Puspita
Terbatas  Alice Diniarti
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
Terbatas  Alice Diniarti
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
BAB5 Karina Dara Puspita
Terbatas  Alice Diniarti
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
Terbatas  Alice Diniarti
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
PUSTAKA Karina Dara Puspita
Terbatas  Alice Diniarti
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
Terbatas  Alice Diniarti
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
PT X is currently developing the SmartMT system, a system intended to improve
the safety and digitalization of fuel distribution operations, which will be installed
on their fuel truck fleet and includes several features to assist the driver and the fleet
management in monitoring the condition of fuel truck. In order for the system to
operate in a good performance, it is necessary that the system is maintained on a
regular basis. The SmartMT system, however, still lacks a proper maintenance
program, leading to a heavy reliance on replacement work whenever a breakdown
occurs. For this reason, an analysis to develop a maintenance program for this
system is required. In this thesis, Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) and
Maintenance Steering Group 3 (MSG-3) analysis will be conducted for the purpose
of identifying possible failures and developing preventive maintenance tasks for the
SmartMT system’s maintenance program. The FMEA aims to identify the
functional failures, their modes and causes, as well as the corresponding failure
effects. Meanwhile, MSG-3 analysis is intended to categorize the failures, which
has been listed during FMEA, based on their effects and to select the appropriate
maintenance tasks to address the issues. Furthermore, a comparison between the
estimated financial risk of run-to-failure approach and preventive maintenance is
provided in the form of a risk acceptability graph to evaluate which option is more
effective.