2019 EJRNL PP HABIB HADJ_MABROUK 1
Terbatas Yanti Sri Rahayu, S.Sos
» ITB
Terbatas Yanti Sri Rahayu, S.Sos
» ITB
In the design, development, and operation of a
rail transport system, all the actors involved use one or
more safety methods to identify hazardous situations, the
causes of hazards, potential accidents, and the severity of
the consequences that would result. The main objective is
to justify and ensure that the design architecture of the
transportation system is safe and presents no particular risk
to users or the environment. As part of this process of
certification, domain experts are responsible for reviewing
the safety of the system, and are being brought in to
imagine new scenarios of potential accidents to ensure the
exhaustiveness of such safety studies. One of the difficulties in this process is to determine abnormal scenarios that
could lead to a particular potential accident. This is the
fundamental point that motivated the present work, whose
objective is to develop tools to assist certification experts in
their crucial task of analyzing and evaluating railway
safety. However, the type of reasoning (inductive, deductive, by analogy, etc.) used by certification experts as well
as the very nature of the knowledge manipulated in this
certification process (symbolic, subjective, evolutionary,
empirical, etc.) justify that conventional computer solutions cannot be adopted; the use of artificial intelligence
(AI) methods and techniques helps to understand the
problem of safety analysis and certification of high-risk
systems such as guided rail transport systems. To help
experts in this complex process of evaluating safety
studies, we decided to use AI techniques and in particular
machine learning to systematize, streamline, and
strengthen conventional approaches used for safety analysis and certification