Abstrak - Adila Rildova
Terbatas  Irwan Sofiyan
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
Terbatas  Irwan Sofiyan
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
BAB 1 Adila Rildova
Terbatas  Irwan Sofiyan
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
Terbatas  Irwan Sofiyan
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
BAB 2 Adila Rildova
Terbatas  Irwan Sofiyan
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
Terbatas  Irwan Sofiyan
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
BAB 3 Adila Rildova
Terbatas  Irwan Sofiyan
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
Terbatas  Irwan Sofiyan
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
BAB 4 Adila Rildova
Terbatas  Irwan Sofiyan
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
Terbatas  Irwan Sofiyan
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
BAB 5 Adila Rildova
Terbatas  Irwan Sofiyan
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
Terbatas  Irwan Sofiyan
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
DAFTAR PUSTAKA Adila Rildova
Terbatas  Irwan Sofiyan
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
Terbatas  Irwan Sofiyan
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
LAMPIRAN Adila Rildova
Terbatas  Irwan Sofiyan
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
Terbatas  Irwan Sofiyan
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
COVER Adila Rildova
Terbatas  Irwan Sofiyan
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
Terbatas  Irwan Sofiyan
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
High-strain rate design requirements for a product require the
consideration of materials' properties under said loading condition. Therefore,
reliable material testing under a high-strain rate is needed. The Split-Hopkinson
Pressure Bar (SHPB) is a common apparatus for dynamic stress-strain response
under high-strain rates. It can be modified for shear stress, becoming a Split-
Hopkinson Shear Bar (SHSB) using a hat-shaped specimen as the test object. The
manufacturing of a hat-shaped specimen requires minimal tolerance, considering
specimen geometry errors might alter the test results. However, less tolerance
also means more difficult production and higher costs.
This research aims to study the effect of geometric error of hat-shaped
specimen for the SHSB by using finite element analysis. This research involves
literature study, data gathering, 3D modelling of split-Hopkinson pressure bars
and specimens, numerical simulation using Abaqus CAE, analysis of results, and
conclusion generation for improved high-shear strain rate testing, with
recommendations for better testing.
Three types of geometric error are studied. The geometric errors studied
are axis perpendicularity, surface parallelism, and surface flatness. This research
concludes a geometric tolerance recommendation for axis perpendicularity of
0.260 mm, surface parallelism of 0.087 mm, and surface flatness of 0.130 mm
based on the characteristic curve error limit.