The aviation sector confronts the imperative of decarbonization, necessitating the
adoption of low-carbon propulsion technologies and alternative fuels. Hydrogen has
emerged as a promising solution, offering the potential for sustainable and carbon-free
aviation, either through combustion engines or fuel cells for electric motors. Unlike
kerosene, the combustion of hydrogen generates no carbon dioxide emissions,
presenting a disruptive innovation for reducing carbon footprints. This study evaluates
whether the existing cabin safety requirements still adequacy and relevant to the
certification specification requirements for liquid hydrogen-powered aircraft.
The research employs a sequential analysis, delineating the content pertinent to liquid
hydrogen for achieving cabin safety of CS-25 requirements in hydrogen-powered
aircraft. This is accomplished through an analysis of fire risks associated with kerosene
and liquid hydrogen concerning established cabin safety regulations for large aircraft.
Utilizing data gathered from prior studies, in-flight and post-crash fire scenarios were
examined for both fuels, employing analysis to unveil thematic similarities and
differences.
The findings indicate that certain existing requirements can be applied to liquid
hydrogen-powered aircraft, on which cabin safety certification is based. However,
these requirements may require updating to improve safety in the context of the
potential risks inherent in the hydrogen environment, which may affect the increased
flammability of materials in the cabin. In addition, new requirements are proposed to
address potential hazards that are not currently accounted for in the existing
regulations. An example is the requirement for ventilation of confined spaces onboard
aircraft to prevent hydrogen accumulation in the event of a leak.