2017 JN PP Jesper Sjostrom_1.pdf
Terbatas  Irwan Sofiyan
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
Terbatas  Irwan Sofiyan
» Gedung UPT Perpustakaan
This forum article contributes to the understanding of how science teachers’
identity is related to their worldviews, cultural values and educational philosophies, and to
eco-transformation of science education. Special focus is put on ‘reform-minded’ science
teachers. The starting point is the paper Science education reform in Confucian learning
cultures: teachers’ perspectives on policy and practice in Taiwan by Ying-Syuan Huang
and Anila Asghar. It highlights several factors that can explain the difficulties of implementing
“new pedagogy” in science education. One important factor is Confucian values
and traditions, which seem to both hinder and support the science teachers’ implementation
of inquiry-based and learner-centered approaches. In this article Confucianism is compared
with other learning cultures and also discussed in relation to different worldviews and
educational philosophies in science education. Just like for the central/north European
educational tradition called Bildung, there are various interpretations of Confucianism.
However, both have subcultures (e.g. reflexive Bildung and Neo-Confucianism) with
similarities that are highlighted in this article. If an “old pedagogy” in science education is
related to essentialism, rationalist-objectivist focus, and a hierarchical configuration, the so
called “new pedagogy” is often related to progressivism, modernism, utilitarianism, and a
professional configuration. Reflexive Bildung problematizes the values associated with
such a “new pedagogy” and can be described with labels such as post-positivism, reconstructionism
and problematizing/critical configurations. Different educational approaches
in science education, and corresponding eco-identities, are commented on in relation to
transformation of educational practice.