2019_EJRNL_PP_MELODY_BLYTHE_JOHNSON_1.pdf
Terbatas Open In Flip Book Lili Sawaludin Mulyadi
» ITB
Terbatas Open In Flip Book Lili Sawaludin Mulyadi
» ITB
Winery wastewater generated during vinification is often co-treated with the municipal wastewater at
the biological sections of the municipal wastewater treatment plants prior to its discharge into the
environment, and the grey water footprint associated with these discharges are often neglected from
water footprint assessments of the wine-making process. This study presents a method for assessing the
grey water footprint associated with winery wastewater co-treated with the municipal wastewater at
municipal wastewater treatment plants. The applicability of this method is illustrated with a case study
for the Niagara Region of Ontario, Canada. The total grey water footprint of treated winery wastewater
effluents discharged to surface waters was determined to be 1.47 107 m3
/yr. Co-treatment substantially
decreased the grey water footprint compared to that of the untreated winery wastewater (99.3%
reduction). However, the co-treated winery wastewater still exerts a substantial grey water footprint
equivalent to over 960 times its total average annual volume and should not, therefore, be excluded from
a water footprint assessment of wine-making processes. The grey water footprint is very sensitive to
changes in the assumed values of background concentration and maximum allowable parameter concentrations in the surface water receiver, and varies significantly for each parameter of concern. Accounting for variations in background concentration of the receiver, Lake Ontario, Canada, between the
discharge locations of the individual wastewater treatment plants increased the calculated grey water
footprint by an order of magnitude. An understanding of the variations in receiver water quality should
be considered as a part of a grey water footprint analysis that combines the footprints of multiple effluent
streams.