CO2-enhanced oil recovery (CO2-EOR) is fundamentally limited by the unfavorable mobility ratio between
CO2 and reservoir oil, causing viscous fingering, gravity override, and poor sweep efficiency in reservoirs
with strong vertical permeability contrast. Foam-assisted water-alternating-gas (FAWAG) addresses this by
generating in-situ foam that raises CO2 apparent viscosity beyond conventional water-alternating-gas
(WAG), yet field foam strength is typically calibrated from laboratory data and may deviate once applied
at reservoir conditions. This study evaluates FAWAG performance for CO2 mobility control through
numerical simulation in CMG STARS on a synthetic layered reservoir model, comparing it against
continuous CO2 injection and WAG on an equivalent injection basis and further examining its sensitivity
to foam strength by scaling the calibrated apparent viscosity from 0.1x to 2.0x. FAWAG achieved the
highest oil recovery and lowest gas production among the three strategies, with gas breakthrough occurring
gradually rather than sharply as under continuous CO2 and WAG. Its advantage over WAG in oil recovery
and gas-oil ratio control persisted across the entire foam strength range, whereas a threshold was identified
below which FAWAG no longer outperformed WAG in sweep efficiency, and CO2 utilization deteriorated
at both strength extremes. These findings indicate that foam strength must be deliberately designed and
validated against target reservoir conditions rather than adopted directly from literature calibration.
Perpustakaan Digital ITB